Dynamics of Low-Level Viremia and Immune Activation after Switching to a Darunavir-Based Regimen.

There is an ongoing debate regarding whether low-level viremia (LLV), in particular persistent LLV, during HIV treatment with optimal adherence originates from low-level viral replication, viral production, or both. We performed an observational study in 30 individuals with LLV who switched to a boosted darunavir (DRV)-based therapy. In-depth virological analyses were used to characterize the viral population and the (activity) of the viral reservoir. Immune activation was examined using cell-bound and soluble markers. The primary outcome was defined as the effect on HIV-RNA and was categorized by responders (<50 cp/mL) or non-responders (>50 cp/mL). At week 24, 53% of the individuals were considered responders, 40% non-responders, and 7% could not be assigned. Sequencing showed no evolution or selection of drug resistance in the non-responders. Production of defective virus with mutations in either the protease (D25N) or RT active site contributed to persistent LLV in two individuals. We show that in about half of the study participants, the switch to a DRV-based regimen resulted in a viral response indicative of ongoing low-level viral replication as the cause of LLV before the switch. Our data confirm that in clinical management, high genetic barrier drugs like DRV are a safe choice, irrespective of the source of LLV.

Plasma Concentrations of Rosmarinic Acid in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy: In Silico Exploration Based on Clinical Data.

Rosmarinic acid (RA) is a phenolic compound with antiviral properties, often encountered in dietary supplements and herbal drugs. Data on the pharmacokinetics of RA are lacking in cases of the chronic use of supplements containing this compound, and only limited data on the metabolism and distribution of RA are available. The aim of the study was to investigate the plasma levels of RA after 12 weeks of use and determine potential interactions of RA and selected antiretroviral drugs. Patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus took a supplement containing RA for 12 weeks, after which the RA concentrations in the plasma samples were analyzed. A detailed in silico analysis was conducted in order to elucidate the potential interactions between RA and the drugs efavirenz, darunavir and raltegravir. It was found that RA can be detected in patients' plasma samples, mainly in the form of sulphoglucuronide. The potential interactions are suggested on the level of liver metabolizing enzymes and efflux P-glycoprotein, with RA competing with antiretroviral drugs as a substrate in metabolism and distribution systems. The present study suggests that the simultaneous use of RA and antiretroviral therapy (containing efavirenz, darunavir or raltegravir) may affect the plasma levels of RA after prolonged supplementation.

Preclinical characterization of a non-peptidomimetic HIV protease inhibitor with improved metabolic stability.

Protease inhibitors (PIs) remain an important component of antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection due to their high genetic barrier to resistance development. Nevertheless, the two most commonly prescribed HIV PIs, atazanavir and darunavir, still require co-administration with a pharmacokinetic boosting agent to maintain sufficient drug plasma levels which can lead to undesirable drug-drug interactions. Herein, we describe GS-9770, a novel investigational non-peptidomimetic HIV PI with unboosted once-daily oral dosing potential due to improvements in its metabolic stability and its pharmacokinetic properties in preclinical animal species. This compound demonstrates potent inhibitory activity and high on-target selectivity for recombinant HIV-1 protease versus other aspartic proteases tested. In cell culture, GS-9770 inhibits Gag polyprotein cleavage and shows nanomolar anti-HIV-1 potency in primary human cells permissive to HIV-1 infection and against a broad range of HIV subtypes. GS-9770 demonstrates an improved resistance profile against a panel of patient-derived HIV-1 isolates with resistance to atazanavir and darunavir. In resistance selection experiments, GS-9770 prevented the emergence of breakthrough HIV-1 variants at all fixed drug concentrations tested and required multiple protease substitutions to enable outgrowth of virus exposed to escalating concentrations of GS-9770. This compound also remained fully active against viruses resistant to drugs from other antiviral classes and showed no in vitro antagonism when combined pairwise with drugs from other antiretroviral classes. Collectively, these preclinical data identify GS-9770 as a potent, non-peptidomimetic once-daily oral HIV PI with potential to overcome the persistent requirement for pharmacological boosting with this class of antiretroviral agents.

Different effects of the companion antiretroviral drugs on dolutegravir trough concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir is widely used in different dual and triple antiretroviral regimens. Here, we sought to investigate the effect of the companion antiretroviral drug(s) on dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations in persons with HIV, with a focus on dual regimens. METHODS: Dolutegravir concentrations collected from October 2015 to March 2023 ( n  = 900) were stratified according to the main antiretroviral classes (NRTIs, NNRTIs, protease inhibitors) and according to single drugs. Dolutegravir concentrations measured in persons with HIV concomitantly treated with lamivudine were considered as the reference group. RESULTS: Dolutegravir trough concentrations were significantly higher in persons with HIV given protease inhibitors compared with the reference [1886 (1036-2940) versus 1575 (1026-2226) ng/ml; P  = 0.004]. The highest dolutegravir concentrations were measured in persons with HIV concomitantly treated with unboosted atazanavir [2908 (2130-4135) ng/ml]. Conversely, co-administration of darunavir/ritonavir resulted in significantly lower dolutegravir exposure [909 (496-1397) ng/ml; P  = 0.002 versus reference]. Among NNRTIs, the higher dolutegravir concentrations were measured in presence of rilpivirine [2252 (1489-2686); P  < 0.001 versus reference]. CONCLUSION: Dolutegravir trough concentrations are differently affected by individual antiretroviral drugs, with some drug combinations (i.e. dolutegravir/darunavir/cobicistat, or dolutegravir/rilpivirine) providing significantly higher than expected dolutegravir exposure. Such combinations might be advantageous when there are concerns about dolutegravir plasma exposure or resistance.

Daily ritonavir-boosted darunavir for viral suppression in pregnancy (DRV-P).

BACKGROUND: Ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) is a preferred protease inhibitor in pregnant women living with HIV. Current practice at British Columbia's referral centre (the Oak Tree Clinic) is to dose DRV/r as 800/100 mg daily throughout pregnancy, although some guidelines recommend DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily due to altered pharmacokinetics with once-daily dosing. OBJECTIVES: We describe the effect of once-daily DRV/r on viral suppression, vertical transmission, adverse drug effects and adherence in pregnant women living with HIV. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of pregnant women living with HIV in British Columbia. Eligible women gave birth between January 2015 and August 2021, and took DRV/r 800/100 mg daily at any time during pregnancy. RESULTS: Thirty-four women were included in this study. The mean (SD) age was 33 (5) years. Thirty (88%) women were diagnosed with HIV prior to pregnancy, with 22 (73%) having viral suppression at baseline. Four (12%) were diagnosed in pregnancy, with a median baseline viral load of 9616 copies/mL (range 8370-165 000). Viral suppression was achieved by 16 (100%), 24 (75%) and 26 (74%) women in the first, second and third trimesters, respectively. No vertical transmission occurred. This combination was well tolerated, with adverse drug effects that did not result in discontinuation or change in therapy. Most women maintained >75% adherence to once-daily DRV/r at all times during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir-boosted darunavir 800/100 mg daily appears to be an appropriate dosing strategy for pregnant women living with HIV who are able to maintain optimal adherence.

Modern antiretroviral regimens in pregnant women: virologic outcomes and durability.

OBJECTIVES: Data are lacking on the virologic efficacy and durability of modern antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens during pregnancy. We compared virologic outcomes at delivery among women receiving dolutegravir versus other ART and the rate of change of the initial pregnancy regimen. DESIGN: Single-site retrospective cohort between 2009 and 2019. METHODS: We used univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations to model the relationship between the maternal ART anchor and the proportion of women with a detectable viral load (greater than or equal to 20 HIV RNA copies/mL of plasma) closest to delivery (suboptimal virologic control) and with a detectable viral load at any time in the third trimester. We also compared changes in ART during pregnancy. RESULTS: We evaluated 230 pregnancies in 173 mothers. Rates of optimal virologic control at delivery did not significantly differ in mothers who received dolutegravir (93.1%), rilpivirine (92.1%), boosted darunavir (82.6%), or efavirenz (76.9%) but were significantly lower among mothers receiving atazanavir (49.0%) or lopinavir (40.9%). The odds of having a detectable viral load at any time in the third trimester was also higher for atazanavir and lopinavir. Raltegravir, elvitegravir, or bictegravir were used in less than 10 mothers at delivery, which precluded statistical analyses. The frequency of change in ART was significantly higher in mothers who initially received elvitegravir (68%) or efavirenz (47%) than dolutegravir (18%). CONCLUSION: Dolutegravir-containing, rilpivirine-containing, and boosted darunavir-containing regimens conferred excellent virologic control in pregnancy. Atazanavir and lopinavir, elvitegravir, and efavirenz were associated with either high rates of virologic failure or regimen change during pregnancy.

A detailed characterization of drug resistance during darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy highlights a high barrier to the emergence of resistance mutations in protease but identifies alternative pathways of resistance.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir has yielded variable outcomes and is not recommended. Trial samples offer valuable opportunities for detailed studies. We analysed samples from a 48 week trial in Cameroon to obtain a detailed characterization of drug resistance. METHODS: Following failure of NNRTI-based therapy and virological suppression on PI-based therapy, participants were randomized to ritonavir-boosted darunavir (n = 81) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine +ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (n = 39). At study entry, PBMC-derived HIV-1 DNA underwent bulk Protease and Reverse Transcriptase (RT) sequencing. At virological rebound (confirmed or last available HIV-1 RNA ≥ 60 copies/mL), plasma HIV-1 RNA underwent ultradeep Protease and RT sequencing and bulk Gag-Protease sequencing. The site-directed mutant T375A (p2/p7) was characterized phenotypically using a single-cycle assay. RESULTS: NRTI and NNRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were detected in 52/90 (57.8%) and 53/90 (58.9%) HIV-1 DNA samples, respectively. Prevalence in rebound HIV-1 RNA (ritonavir-boosted darunavir, n = 21; ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, n = 2) was 9/23 (39.1%) and 10/23 (43.5%), respectively, with most RAMs detected at frequencies ≥15%. The resistance patterns of paired HIV-1 DNA and RNA sequences were partially consistent. No darunavir RAMs were found. Among eight participants experiencing virological rebound on ritonavir-boosted darunavir (n = 12 samples), all had Gag mutations associated with PI exposure, including T375N, T375A (p2/p7), K436R (p7/p1) and substitutions in p17, p24, p2 and p6. T375A conferred 10-fold darunavir resistance and increased replication capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the high resistance barrier of ritonavir-boosted darunavir while identifying alternative pathways of resistance through Gag substitutions. During virological suppression, resistance patterns in HIV-1 DNA reflect treatment history, but due to technical and biological considerations, cautious interpretation is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Once-Daily Darunavir With Cobicistat and Weekly Isoniazid/Rifapentine.

BACKGROUND: Once-weekly isoniazid with rifapentine (HP) for 3 months is a recommended treatment for latent tuberculosis infection in persons with HIV. HP reduces exposures of certain antiretroviral medications, resulting in limited options for the concomitant use of these therapies. Here, we examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of darunavir/cobicistat with HP. METHODS: This was an open-label, fixed sequence, two-period crossover study in persons without HIV. Participants received darunavir 800 mg/cobicistat 150 mg once-daily alone for 4 days, then continued darunavir/cobicistat once-daily for days 5-19 with HP coadministration on days 5, 12, and 19. Intensive PK assessments were performed on days 4, 14, and 19. PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and compared between phases using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Thirteen participants were enrolled. Two withdrew after day 4, and one withdrew after day 14. Of the 3 withdrawals, 2 were attributed to drug-related adverse events. Darunavir area under the concentration-time curve, maximum concentrations (Cmax), and concentrations at 24 hours postdose (C24h) were reduced by 71%, 41%, and 96% ∼48-72 hours after HP administration (day 14), respectively, and 36%, 17%, and 89% with simultaneous HP administration (day 19), respectively. On day 14, 45% of the predose and 73% of C24h concentrations were below the darunavir EC50 (0.055 µg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Darunavir exposures were significantly decreased with HP coadministration. Temporal relationships between HP coadministration and the extent of induction or mixed inhibition/induction of darunavir metabolism were apparent. Coadministration of darunavir/cobicistat with 3HP should be avoided.

HIV-DNA decrease during treatment in primary HIV-1 infection with three different drug regimens: Italian Network of Acute HIV Infection (INACTION) clinical trial.

As the introduction of antiretroviral therapy (ART) during primary HIV-1 infection (PHI) could restrict the establishment of HIV reservoirs, we aimed to assess the effect of three different ART regimens on HIV-DNA load in people living with HIV (PLWH), who started ART in PHI. Randomized, open-label, multicentric study, including subjects in PHI (defined as an incomplete HIV-1 Western blot and detectable plasma HIV-RNA) in the Italian Network of Acute HIV Infection cohort. Participants were randomly assigned (10:10:8) to a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) 10 mg plus emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg, darunavir 800 mg, and cobicistat 150 mg once daily (group A), or TAF 25 mg plus FTC 200 mg, dolutegravir 50 mg once daily (group B), or an intensified four-drug regimen (TAF 10 mg plus FTC 200 mg, dolutegravir 50 mg, darunavir 800 mg, and cobicistat 150 mg once daily) (group C). The primary endpoint was the decrease of HIV-DNA copies/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at weeks (W) 12 and 48. Secondary endpoints were increased in CD4+ cells and in CD4+/CD8+ ratio and percentage of PLWH reaching undetectable HIV-RNA. HIV-DNA was quantified by Droplet Digital PCR (Biorad QX100) and normalized to RPP30 reference gene. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT04225325). Among 78 participants enrolled, 30 were randomized to group 1, 28 to group 2, and 20 to group 3. At baseline, median CD4+ count was 658/µL (476-790), HIV-RNA 5.37 (4.38, 6.12) log10 copies/mL, without statistical difference in their change among groups at weeks 12 and 48 (p = 0.432 and 0.234, respectively). The trial was prematurely discontinued for slow accrual and for COVID-19 pandemic-associated restrictions. In the per-protocol analysis, PLWH (n = 72) with undetectable viral load was 54.3% at W12 and 86.4% at W48. Interestingly, the CD4/CD8 ratio progressively increased over time, up to normalization in almost half of the cohort by week 48, despite a deflection in group 3; no difference was observed by the Fiebig stage (I-III vs. IV-VI). HIV-DNA decreased from 4.46 (4.08, 4.81) log10 copies/106 PBMCs to 4.22 (3.79, 4.49) at week 12, and 3.87 (3.46, 4.34) at week 48, without difference among groups. At multivariable analysis, HIV-DNA delta at W48 was associated only with the increase of CD4+ count by 100 cells/mm3 but not with the Fiebig stage, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and treatment arm, despite a higher decrease in group 3. Six adverse events were recorded during our study, which did not cause any withdrawal from the study. We observed a decrease in HIV-DNA from baseline to W48 in PLWH treated during PHI, associated with an increase in CD4+ count, unrelated to the treatment arm.

Switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) plus darunavir/cobicistat in heavily antiretroviral-experienced, virologically suppressed HIV-infected adults receiving complex regimens.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two-pill regimen bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) plus darunavir/cobicistat as a switching strategy in heavily treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH). METHODS: Multicentre, prospective, single-arm pilot clinical trial. Participants were virologically suppressed adults receiving a stable antiretroviral regimen of at least three pills from at least three drug families due to previous virological failures and/or toxicities with no documented resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors or darunavir (≥15 points, Stanford). Clinical and laboratory assessments were performed at 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks. HIV-1 proviral DNA was amplified and sequenced by Illumina at baseline. Plasma bictegravir concentrations were determined in 22 patients using UHPLC-MS/MS. The primary study endpoint was viral load (VL)< 50 copies/mL at Week 48 (ITT). RESULTS: We enrolled 63 participants (92% men) with median baseline CD4 count of 515 cells/mm3 (IQR: 334.5-734.5), 24 years on ART (IQR: 15.9-27.8). The median number of pills was 4 (range: 3-10). At baseline, proviral DNA was amplified in 39 participants: 33/39 had resistance mutations. Three participants discontinued owing to toxicity. At 48 weeks, 95% had VL < 50 copies/mL by ITT and 100% by PP analysis. A modest increase was observed in the bictegravir plasma concentration, and a significant decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed only at Week 4, probably related to interaction with renal transporters. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that BIC/FTC/TAF + darunavir/cobicistat is an effective, well-tolerated regimen that may improve convenience and, potentially, long-term success in stable heavily pre-treated PLWH.

Pharmacokinetics of Antiretroviral Drugs in Older People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) has significantly improved in recent decades, mostly due to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy. Aging can affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs and, as a consequence, increase the risk of drug interactions and toxicity that may impact treatment. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature on the effect of aging on ARV pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Searches were performed in the BVS, EMBASE and PUBMED databases until November 2022. All studies available in English, Spanish and Portuguese investigating the pharmacokinetics of ARV approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2005 to 2020 were selected. Peer-reviewed publications were included if they met all criteria: adults (≥ 18 years of age) living with or without HIV; report any pharmacokinetic parameter or plasma concentration of at least one of the following ARVs: tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF); doravirine (DOR), rilpivirine (RIL) and etravirine (ETR); darunavir (DRV), tipranavir (TPV) and fostemsavir (FTR); dolutegravir (DTG), raltegravir (RAL), bictegravir (BIC) and elvitegravir (EVG); maraviroc (MVC); ibalizumab (IBA); cobicistat (COBI). Pharmacokinetic parameters were reported stratified per age group: young adults (aged 18-49 years) or older (age ≥ 50 years) and all studies were evaluated for quality. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42021236432). RESULTS: Among 97 studies included, 20 reported pharmacokinetic evaluation in older individuals (age ≥ 50 years). Twenty five percent of the articles were phase I randomized clinical trials with HIV-negative participants and non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis presenting the parameters area under the curve (AUC) and peak drug concentration (Cmax). Seven age-stratified studies evaluated BIC, ETR, DRV, DTG, DOR and RAL. We found publications with discordant results for ETR and DTG pharmacokinetics in different age groups. DRV exposure was highly variable but modestly increased in aging PLWHIV. In contrast, no influence of age on BIC, DOR and RAL exposure was observed. A variability in pharmacokinetic parameters could be observed for the other ARVs (TAF and MVC) in different age groups. CONCLUSION: Exposure to DRV increases modestly with age, while exposure to BIC, DOR and RAL appears to be unaffected by age. As the available evidence to confirm a potential effect of aging on ARV pharmacokinetics is limited, further studies are necessary.

HIV-1 genotypic profiling ensures effective response to third-line antiretroviral therapy in Cameroon.

In order to limit the emergence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance in a context of limited antiretroviral options, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of third-line (3L) regimens considering HIV genotypic resistance profile at initiation of 3L in Cameroon. A cohort-study was conducted from January-September 2020 among patients initiating a 3L antiretroviral therapy regimen at the Yaoundé Central Hospital. HIV-1 protease-reverse transcriptase was sequenced at the Chantal Biya international reference center for research on HIV/AIDS prevention and management and results were interpreted using Stanford HIVdbv8.3. Good virological response (viral load < 390 copies/mL) was assessed after 12 months using OPP-ERA platform. Statistical analyses were performed using Epi Info v7.2.2.6, with P < .05 considered statistically significant. Of the 38 patients initiating 3L with an available genotyping (42% female; median age, 49 [39-57] years), median cluster of differentiation type 4 count and viral load were 173 [34-374] cells/µL and 169,322 [30,382-551,826] copies/mL, respectively. At enrollment, all patients harbored resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and 66% (25/38) to protease-inhibitors, although 63% (24/38) were still susceptible to darunavir/ritonavir. Preferred 3L regimen was dolutegravir + darunavir/r + tenofovir + lamivudine (51%) and median duration on 3L was 21 [17-32] months. Interestingly, 82% (31/38) of the participants achieved good virological response on 3L, regardless of genotypic profile at recruitment, variations in 3L regimens (P = .9) and baseline cluster of differentiation type 4 count (P = .3). Despite the high burden of reverse transcriptase inhibitor - and protease inhibitor boosted by ritonavir drug resistance, genotyping-guided 3L regimens is accompanied by virological success in most patients. This high efficacy, most likely due to use of high genetic barrier antiretrovirals, requires continuous adherence support alongside close monitoring for long-term effectiveness in similar programmatic settings.

First Pharmacokinetic Data of Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate and Tenofovir With Dolutegravir or Boosted Protease Inhibitors in African Children: A Substudy of the CHAPAS-4 Trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) and tenofovir in a subset of African children enrolled in the CHAPAS-4 trial. METHODS: Children aged 3-15 years with human immunodeficiency virus infection failing first-line antiretroviral therapy were randomized to emtricitabine/TAF versus standard-of-care nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combination, plus dolutegravir, atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, or lopinavir/ritonavir. Daily emtricitabine/TAF was dosed according to World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended weight bands: 120/15 mg in children weighing 14 to <25 kg and 200/25 mg in those weighing ≥25 kg. At steady state, 8-9 blood samples were taken to construct pharmacokinetic curves. Geometric mean (GM) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) were calculated for TAF and tenofovir and compared to reference exposures in adults. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic results from 104 children taking TAF were analyzed. GM (coefficient of variation [CV%]) TAF AUClast when combined with dolutegravir (n = 18), darunavir/ritonavir (n = 34), or lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 20) were 284.5 (79), 232.0 (61), and 210.2 (98) ng*hour/mL, respectively, and were comparable to adult reference values. When combined with atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 32), TAF AUClast increased to 511.4 (68) ng*hour/mL. For each combination, tenofovir GM (CV%) AUCtau and Cmax remained below reference values in adults taking 25 mg TAF with a boosted protease inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: In children, TAF combined with boosted PIs or dolutegravir and dosed according to WHO-recommended weight bands provides TAF and tenofovir concentrations previously demonstrated to be well tolerated and effective in adults. These data provide the first evidence for use of these combinations in African children. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ISRCTN22964075.

Efficacy and Durability of Dolutegravir- or Darunavir-Based Regimens in ART-Naïve AIDS- or Late-Presenting HIV-Infected Patients.

BACKGROUND: Since limited data are available, we aimed to compare the efficacy and durability of dolutegravir and darunavir in advanced naïve patients. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study including AIDS- or late-presenting (def. CD4 ≤ 200/µL) HIV-infected patients starting dolutegravir or ritonavir/cobicistat-boosted darunavir+2NRTIs. Patients were followed from the date of first-line therapy initiation (baseline, BL) to the discontinuation of darunavir or dolutegravir, or for a maximum of 36 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall 308 patients (79.2% males, median age 43 years, 40.3% AIDS-presenters, median CD4 66 cells/µL) were enrolled; 181 (58.8%) and 127 (41.2%) were treated with dolutegravir and darunavir, respectively. Incidence of treatment discontinuation (TD), virological failure (VF, defined as a single HIV-RNA > 1000 cp/mL or two consecutive HIV-RNA > 50 cp/mL after 6 months of therapy or after virological suppression had been achieved), treatment failure (the first of TD or VF), and optimal immunological recovery (defined as CD4 ≥ 500/µL + CD4 ≥ 30% + CD4/CD8 ≥ 1) were 21.9, 5.2, 25.6 and 1.4 per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively, without significant differences between dolutegravir and darunavir (p > 0.05 for all outcomes). However, a higher estimated probability of TD for central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (at 36 months: 11.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.002) was observed for dolutegravir, whereas darunavir showed a higher probability of TD for simplification (at 36 months: 21.3% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir and darunavir showed similar efficacy in AIDS- and late-presenting patients. A higher risk of TD due to CNS toxicity was observed with dolutegravir, and a higher probability of treatment simplification with darunavir.

PRESTIGIO RING: "A 59-year-old HIV-1 positive, highly treatment-experienced woman failing darunavir/ ritonavir plus raltegravir".

Management of heavily treatment experienced (HTE) people with HIV remains a challenge. Tailored antiretroviral therapy (ART) is needed in this fragile population who almost invariably harbor viral quasispecies with resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). The reference method for HIV genotypic resistance testing (GRT) has long been Sanger sequencing (SS), but next-generation sequencing (NGS), following recent progress in workflow and cost-effectiveness, is replacing SS because of higher sensitivity. From the PRESTIGIO Registry, we present a case of a 59-year-old HTE woman who failed darunavir/ritonavir plus raltegravir at low-viremia levels due mainly to high pill burden and poor adherence. NGS-GRT was performed on HIV-RNA at failure and the results were compared to all past SS-GRT data available (historical genotype). In this case, NGS-GRT did not detect any minority drug-resistant variants. After discussing several therapeutic options, the treatment was changed to dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily plus doravirine 100 mg once a day, based on clinical history, adherence issues, and pill burden, as well as the historical SS-GRT and the latest NGS-GRT results. At six months follow-up visit, the patient had HIV-RNA below 30 copies/ml and CD4+ T cell count increased from 673 cells/ mm3 to 688 cells/ mm3. Close follow-up of this patient is ongoing.

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naïve (AMBER) and virologically suppressed (EMERALD) participants with neurological and/or psychiatric comorbidities: Week 96 subgroup analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of pre-existing neurological and/or psychiatric comorbidities (NPCs) and efficacy/safety outcomes for participants with versus without baseline NPCs in AMBER and EMERALD. METHODS: AMBER (treatment-naïve population) and EMERALD (virologically suppressed population) were phase III randomized studies of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg. The primary objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess virological response (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) at week 48 by intent-to-treat US Food and Drug Administration snapshot analysis comparing participants with and without baseline NPCs. RESULTS: Among participants in AMBER, 88/362 (24%) in the D/C/F/TAF arm and 99/363 (27%) in the control arm had baseline NPCs; in EMERALD, 294/763 (39%; D/C/F/TAF) and 166/378 (44%; control) participants had baseline NPCs. At baseline, psychiatric NPCs were more common than neurological NPCs in both studies; the most common of each type were depression and headache, respectively. High virological response rates were achieved with D/C/F/TAF across studies regardless of baseline NPCs at weeks 48 (range 86%-95%) and 96 (range 80%-91%). No participants in either study with a baseline NPC prematurely discontinued because of a study drug-related neurological or psychiatric adverse event. CONCLUSION: D/C/F/TAF may be a suitable treatment option for individuals with HIV-1 and NPCs.

Selection of HIV-1 for resistance to fifth-generation protease inhibitors reveals two independent pathways to high-level resistance.

Darunavir (DRV) is exceptional among potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) in high drug concentrations that are achieved in vivo. Little is known about the de novo resistance pathway for DRV. We selected for resistance to high drug concentrations against 10 PIs and their structural precursor DRV. Mutations accumulated through two pathways (anchored by protease mutations I50V or I84V). Small changes in the inhibitor P1'-equivalent position led to preferential use of one pathway over the other. Changes in the inhibitor P2'-equivalent position determined differences in potency that were retained in the resistant viruses and that impacted the selected mutations. Viral variants from the two pathways showed differential selection of compensatory mutations in Gag cleavage sites. These results reveal the high level of selective pressure that is attainable with fifth-generation PIs and how features of the inhibitor affect both the resistance pathway and the residual potency in the face of resistance.

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound and total dolutegravir concentrations in children aged 12†years and older: a PK substudy of the SMILE trial.

BACKGROUND: SMILE, a multicentre randomized trial, compared the efficacy and safety of switching virologically suppressed children and adolescents with HIV to a once-daily dual regimen of dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir versus continuing standard ART. Within a nested pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy, we performed a population PK analysis to describe total and unbound dolutegravir plasma concentrations in children and adolescents receiving this dual therapy. METHODS: Sparse blood samples were obtained during follow-up for dolutegravir quantification. A population PK model was developed to simultaneously describe total and unbound dolutegravir concentrations. Simulations were performed and were compared with the protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) and the in vitro IC50, respectively. Dolutegravir exposures in children aged ≥12 years were also compared with values in treatment-experienced adults. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-five samples from 153 participants aged between 12 and 18 years were collected for this PK analysis. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described unbound dolutegravir concentrations. The relationship between unbound and total dolutegravir concentrations was best characterized by a non-linear model. Unbound dolutegravir apparent clearance was significantly influenced by total bilirubin concentrations and by Asian ethnicity. All children and adolescents had trough concentrations well above the protein-adjusted IC90 and the in vitro IC50 values. Dolutegravir concentrations and exposures were also similar to those obtained in adults receiving dolutegravir 50 mg once daily. CONCLUSIONS: A once-daily 50 mg dolutegravir dose for children and adolescents produces adequate total and unbound concentrations when used as part of dual therapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir.

Efficacy of Dolutegravir versus Darunavir in Antiretroviral First-Line Regimens According to Resistance Mutations and Viral Subtype.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir (DTG)-based first-line regimens have shown superior efficacy versus darunavir (DRV)-based ones in randomized trials. We compared these two strategies in clinical practice, particularly considering the role of pre-treatment drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and of the HIV-1 subtype. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The multicenter Antiretroviral Resistance Cohort Analysis (ARCA) database was queried to identify HIV-1-positive patients starting a first-line therapy with 2NRTIs plus either DTG or DRV between 2013 and 2019. Only adult (≥18 years) patients with a genotypic resistance test (GRT) prior to therapy and with HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL were selected. Through multivariable Cox regressions, we compared DTG- versus DRV-based regimens in the time to virological failure (VF) stratifying for pre-treatment DRMs and the viral subtype. RESULTS: A total of 649 patients was enrolled, with 359 (55.3%) and 290 (44.7) starting DRV and DTG, respectively. In 11 months of median follow-up time, there were 41 VFs (8.4 in 100 patient-years follow-up, PYFU) and 15 VFs (5.3 per 100 PYFU) in the DRV and DTG groups, respectively. Compared with a fully active DTG-based regimen, the risk of VF was higher with DRV (aHR 2.33; p = 0.016), and with DTG-based regimens with pre-treatment DRMs to the backbone (aHR 17.27; p = 0.001), after adjusting for age, gender, baseline CD4 count and HIV-RNA, concurrent AIDS-defining event and months since HIV diagnosis. Compared with patients harboring a B viral subtype and treated with a DTG-based regimen, patients on DRV had an increased risk of VF, both in subtype B (aHR 3.35; p = 0.011), C (aHR 8.10; p = 0.005), CRF02-AG (aHR 5.59; p = 0.006) and G (aHR 13.90; p < 0.001); DTG also demonstrated a reduced efficacy in subtypes C (versus B, aHR 10.24; p = 0.035) and CRF01-AE (versus B; aHR 10.65; p = 0.035). Higher baseline HIV-RNA and a longer time since HIV diagnosis also predicted VF. CONCLUSIONS: In line with randomized trials, DTG-based first-line regimens showed an overall superior efficacy compared with DRV-based regimens. GRT may still play a role in identifying patients more at risk of VF and in guiding the choice of an antiretroviral backbone.